Monthly Archives: October 2024

On Designing Biodiversity-Friendly Orchards

The following is my premise on a method for establishing biodiversity-friendly orchards with reduced economic risk.

In recent years, I have observed a troubling trend in the fertile agricultural lands of Cilicia* where owners of many orchards have ordered the removal of established trees to be replaced by other trendy varieties in response to the fluctuating market demands. This practice of demolishing and replanting orchards based on economic impulse not only creates significant stress on the farmers but also proves to be economically unfeasible in the long term, where one finds himself in the negative balances while constantly trying to keep pace with the mostly irrational market trends, some of them which had brought down the price of previously successful produce to nearly zero for years**.

Imagine a traditional orchard, where one plants the same tree species—such as tangerine trees—uniformly across a 180,000 m² of agricultural land parcel in a 6×6 grid format to foster maximum growth and permit maintenance practice between the trees. This setup, while convenient, is an artificial scenario rarely, if not, never found in nature. In natural parks, jungles, and forests, we observe a diverse mix of smaller and larger trees based on their ages, with the older and more massive trees serving as wind barriers that protect the younger ones from potential damage. The diversity in age and species of trees found in nature provides a wide array of nutrition options which attract wild animals, insects, and other microorganisms. This natural biodiversity with its symbiotic foundational principles enriches the soil through their various life activities, fostering a healthier and more organic soil, which is alive with activity. In stark contrast, consider the degraded agricultural soil constantly treated with pesticides and nursed with liquid chemical fertilizers, where farmers prioritize short-term gains on fruit yields over long term gains of soil properties and individual tree health. This approach undermines the long-term well-being of the ecosystem and soil vitality.

The critical question we should consider is: How can we systematically design our agricultural landscapes to replicate the natural processes outlined above, thereby attracting natural and sustainable biodiversity? An approach that would contribute to the long-term health and fertility of our soil, diminishing our reliance on chemical fertilizers and, to some degree, pesticides. By fostering a diverse ecosystem mimicking that of the natural settings of mother nature herself, we can attract a range of beneficial insects instead of overwhelming swarms of uniform pests that result from planting the same foreign tree species repeatedly in close proximity. Thus, the newly established diversity first in tree species and then in insects and wild animals could enhance ecological resilience and promote a healthier environment and soil in the long run.1

Continue reading

Empathy in Leadership: Grant and Lee’s Historic Meeting at Appomattox

During the final moments of the Civil War, after corresponding via letters to discuss terms, General Robert E. Lee met with General Ulysses S. Grant at the Appomattox Court House on April 9, 1865, to formally surrender the Army of Northern Virginia to the Union’s Army of the Potomac. Lee, proud and emotional, arrived in full confederate gray military regalia, while Grant, not expecting the meeting so soon, was dressed in a more modest, shabby used uniform with mud stains on his boots. This contrast between the two leaders visually reflected the two very different characters of the generals. Grant was widely recognized for his modest demeanor and unassuming appearance, to the extent that many soldiers in his own ranks often had difficulty identifying him as the commanding lieutenant general, given his lack of formality and polished attire.1 Before their meeting at Appomattox, the two had briefly crossed paths years ago during the Mexican-American War (1846-1848). Grant, then a junior officer, remembered the esteemed General Lee and mentioned their past encounter, though Lee did not recall their earlier meeting.*

Image 1: “Lee’s surrender 1865. ‘Peace in Union.’ The surrender of General Lee to General Grant at Appomattox Court House, Virginia, 9 April 1865. Reproduction of a painting by Thomas Nast, which was completed thirty years after the surrender.”2

After an extended period of cordial conversation, during which Grant later reflected in his memoirs on how agreeable their exchange had been—so much so that he nearly lost sight of the meeting’s true purpose—General Lee eventually redirected the discussion to the matter at hand, inquiring about the terms of surrender. With characteristic magnanimity, shaped by the many hardships he had faced in his own career, Grant astonished Lee by offering unexpectedly generous terms for the Confederate surrender. Rather than imposing harsh punishments, Grant allowed the soldiers of the army of Northern Virginia to return home unhindered. They were provided with Union rations, allowed to keep their personal arms, and given safe passage back to their homes to resume their civilian lives. There were no trials, no confiscations, no immediate retributions—just a pathway back to peace.

Continue reading